Anthropic CCA-F 試験概要:
| 認定ベンダー: | Anthropic |
|---|---|
| 試験名: | Claude Certified Architect – Foundations (CCA-F) |
| 試験番号: | CCA-F |
| 認定の有効期間: | 公式には未規定 |
| 関連資格: | Claude Certified Architect |
| 試験形式: | シナリオベース, 選択式 |
| 受験料: | 99 USD(初期の無料パートナー枠適用後) |
| 試験時間: | 120 分 |
| 対応言語: | 英語 |
| 合格点: | 720/1000 |
| 出題数: | 60 |
| サンプル問題: | Anthropic CCA-F サンプル問題 |
| 受験方法: | オンライン監視付き認定試験(シナリオベース、選択式)。通常、Anthropic パートナーまたは Anthropic Academy への登録を通じてアクセスします。 |
| 前提条件: | LLM API、プロンプトエンジニアリング、およびソフトウェア開発(Python または同等)に関する基本的な知識。Claude または LLM アプリケーションの開発経験が約6ヶ月以上あることが推奨されます。 |
| 公式シラバスのURL: | https://claude.com/partners |
Anthropic CCA-F 試験シラバストピック:
| セクション | 比重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| トピック 1: エージェンティック・アーキテクチャとオーケストレーション | 27% | - マルチエージェント・オーケストレーション
|
| トピック 2: Claude Code の構成とワークフロー | 20% | - CI/CD とワークフローの統合
|
| トピック 3: コンテキスト管理と信頼性 | 15% | - コンテキストウィンドウの最適化
|
| トピック 4: プロンプトエンジニアリングと構造化出力 | 20% | - ツール拡張プロンプト
|
| トピック 5: ツール設計と MCP 統合 | 18% | - ツールインターフェース設計
|
Anthropic Claude Certified Architect Foundations (CCA-F) 認定 CCA-F 試験問題:
問題 #1
An enterprise wants Claude responses to remain professional across every interaction. Where should tone instructions primarily reside?
A. API key description
B. User prompt only
C. System prompt
D. Retrieved documents
問題 #2
A customer writes: "I've been going back and forth on this return for days. I just want to speak to someone who can actually help me." The agent has confirmed via lookup_order that the return is straightforward - within policy and eligible for immediate processing. What should the agent do?
A. Acknowledge frustration, inform them this is resolvable now, and offer to complete it or escalate
B. Ask what specifically hasn't worked in previous attempts before deciding whether to escalate or resolve automatically
C. Call escalate_to_human immediately to honor the customer's request
D. Process the refund via process_refund to resolve the underlying issue, then inform them it's complete
問題 #3
You've configured the system so that all four subagents have access to the complete set of
18 tools. During testing, agents frequently call tools outside their specialization - the synthesis agent attempts web searches, and the report generator tries to analyze documents. What is the primary cause of this poor tool selection behavior?
A. The tool definitions consume too much context window space, leaving insufficient room for task content.
B. Choosing from 18 tools instead of 4-5 relevant ones increases decision complexity beyond reliable selection thresholds.
C. The coordinator cannot track which capabilities each subagent has, leading to misrouted tasks.
D. The agents' role descriptions in their system prompts conflict with having access to tools outside that role.
問題 #4
Your agent uses three tools: get_property_details(property_id) returns data including street address, get_price_history(property_id) returns historical pricing, and get_neighborhood_info(address) returns area statistics. You observe that get_neighborhood_info always requires get_property_details first just to extract the address, even when users specify the property by ID. This creates unnecessary latency and failure coupling - if the first call fails, the neighborhood request also fails. What tool design change best addresses this?
A. Add retry logic and timeout handling to get_property_details.
B. Create a lookup_address(property_id) helper tool for retrieving addresses.
C. Consolidate into a single get_property_with_neighborhood(property_id) tool returning both datasets.
D. Change get_neighborhood_info to accept property_id, resolving the address internally.
問題 #5
Production reviews reveal inconsistent handling of uncertainty in final reports. Sometimes conflicting subagent findings are synthesized into a single confident statement (losing nuance), while other times reports over-hedge with excessive qualifications (becoming unhelpful). When the web search agent returns "industry analysts estimate $50B market size (methodology varies)" and the document analysis agent returns "peer-reviewed study estimates $35B (±$7B, 95% CI)," the coordinator either picks one arbitrarily or produces vague statements like "the market may be
$35B-$50B depending on factors." What systematic approach best addresses this?
A. Configure subagents to only report findings meeting a high-confidence threshold, filtering uncertain information before it reaches the coordinator.
B. Implement a confidence calibration layer that normalizes subagent uncertainty expressions to standardized probability scores (0.0-1.0), then weight-average findings by their calibrated confidence.
C. Add a verification subagent that cross-references findings across sources, only passing claims to synthesis that are corroborated by at least two independent sources.
D. Instruct the synthesis agent to structure reports with explicit sections distinguishing well- established findings from contested ones, preserving original source characterizations and methodological context.
解説:
| 問題 #1 正解: C | 問題 #2 正解: A | 問題 #3 正解: B | 問題 #4 正解: D | 問題 #5 正解: D |














1256 お客様のコメント
品質保証JPexamはIT認定試験のシラバスに従って、試験問題の範囲を正確に絞って、的中率が99%の最新問題集を捧げます。
1年間の無料更新サービスJPexamは1年以内に問題集の無料更新サービスを提供し、お客様がいつでも最新版の問題集を持つことを保証いたします。もし試験の内容が変更されたら、弊社は直ちにお客様にお知らせします。それに、弊社の問題集が更新されたら、早速メールで最新バージョンを送付いたします。
全額返金JPexamの問題集を利用すると、短時間で勉強しても試験に合格できるのを保証いたします。試験に不合格になってしまった場合、弊社は全額返金いたします。(
ご購入前のお試しJPexamは問題集のサンプルを無料で提供いたします。ご購入前にサンプルを試用して製品の品質を確認することができます。ご遠慮なく利用してください。
