SAP C-DBADM-2601 試験概要:

SAP C-DBADM-2601 試験シラバストピック:

SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA 認定 C-DBADM-2601 試験問題：

問題 #1

CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
The upgraded reporting system and the installed validation database both pass connection checks. The upgraded system's configuration value exists in monitoring notes, while the validation database value exists in the administration record. Which validation sequence is most appropriate?

A. Use the SAP HANA Cloud sample dataset as the comparison reference for both systems.
B. Apply the validation database value to the upgraded system before reviewing existing evidence.
C. Accept connection checks, then update configuration records after cutover approval.
D. Confirm active states, reconcile administration records, then accept comparison evidence.

問題 #2

A regional specialty foods company is rehearsing a phased move from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The migration transfer completes, and database explorer can query the cloud target. During validation, the administrator finds that the cloud-side backup review was performed before the imported content was available, while monitoring review was performed after import. The project lead wants approval because both checks appear in the workbook.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove target administration readiness after the migrated state exists. The team needs repeatable validation evidence for later waves, not a checklist that mixes pre-import and post-import states.
What should the administrator recommend?

A. Repeat only the data transfer because the timing mismatch indicates that the imported content may not have reached the cloud target.
B. Repeat the target-side backup review after import, confirm monitoring evidence for the same migrated state, and approve only if both pass.
C. Defer backup review until after production cutover because monitoring was already validated after import.
D. Approve the rehearsal because both backup review and monitoring review are present in the validation workbook.

問題 #3

A consumer lending firm runs an on-premises SAP HANA database for core transaction support and uses SAP HANA Cloud for selected analytical workloads. During the morning review, administrators see that the database remains available and background jobs finished, but one monitoring dashboard now shows repeated alert bursts for a short interval after each monitoring cycle.
The alert pattern clears on its own and does not affect general user processing. A team member recommends disabling the noisy alert because it looks self-correcting. The operations lead wants to keep monitoring reliable without hiding a genuine issue, and the first action must stay within current operating scope.
What is the best first action?

A. Increase system capacity immediately because repeated alerts prove the current environment is under-sized.
B. Disable the alert temporarily because self-clearing alerts do not represent a meaningful operational problem.
C. Restart the monitored database so the alert pattern can be cleared before the next review cycle begins.
D. Review whether the alert bursts are caused by a specific monitoring threshold or collection sequence before changing the alert design.

問題 #4

A regional laboratory services provider operates SAP HANA in a mixed landscape supporting internal analytics and administrative applications. During a deployment review, the architecture worksheet shows that one reporting workload was assigned to a target environment intended for operational administration tasks. The workload owner reports that the system is reachable, but the monitoring summary shows inconsistent resource usage during business-hour reporting.
The constraint is that the administrator must determine whether the placement supports the intended SAP HANA workload pattern before any configuration change is approved. The review must distinguish basic reachability from architecture-fit validation because later lifecycle and monitoring tasks will depend on the selected deployment context.
Which action best supports the architecture review?

A. Move the workload to the newest available environment because modernization is part of the landscape direction.
B. Approve the placement because the workload owner confirmed that the SAP HANA system is reachable.
C. Validate the workload characteristics against the selected SAP HANA deployment context and update the architecture record before approving dependent administration settings.
D. Increase monitoring thresholds so the inconsistent resource usage does not block the deployment review.

問題 #5

CHALLENGE 4 - Regional Release Recovery Assurance
The remediation lead can release the regional template on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay briefly to include recovery validation for the remediation database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?

A. Cancel the regional release because recovery validation was not completed before testing began.
B. Release on schedule because meeting the template date is the strongest governance outcome.
C. Delay briefly to complete recoverability evidence for systems supporting the regional release.
D. Release on schedule and attach recovery validation to the future SAP HANA Cloud migration plan.

解説：