SAP C_TS452_2601 試験概要:

SAP C_TS452_2601 試験シラバストピック:

SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452_2601 試験問題：

1. <strong>CHALLENGE 3 &#x2014; Vendor Role Boundaries Across Service and Material Demand</strong> During close preparation, suppliers intended for service-related procurement begin appearing in overlapping patterns with suppliers intended for material purchasing in representative depot scenarios. The shared template was designed to preserve clearer vendor role boundaries. What is the best interpretation?

A) The project should remove service-related procurement from first-close validation to simplify supplier handling
B) The template is working because the system can still find a supplier route for the depot demand
C) The team should validate whether supplier agreements and purchasing conditions still preserve vendor role boundaries under mixed operational demand
D) The overlapping behavior proves that vendor role boundaries are unnecessary in the target model

2. <strong>CHALLENGE 2 &#x2014; Planning Interaction Consistency for Recurring Assembly Procurement</strong> A reviewer notes that a recurring assembly scenario can still be processed under two viable approaches: one keeps procurement behavior closely linked to the intended planning interaction, and the other relies on local intervention so execution feels simpler. The template office wants the path that should guide promotion readiness. Which answer is best?

A) Use the simpler local route because any method that completes recurring procurement is acceptable during remediation
B) Keep both procurement approaches available so each plant can choose during the next rollout wave
C) Allow one plant to use the simpler route and keep the formal planning-linked behavior at the other plant
D) Use the intended planning-linked procurement behavior unless it prevents recurring demand from being processed in a workable operational sequence

3. <strong>CHALLENGE 1 &#x2014; Source Eligibility Control for Shared Regulated Materials</strong> During SIT, two sites create purchase orders for the same regulated solvent used in batch preparation. Both sites can create the documents, but one site later routes demand to a supplier that is not following the intended approved-source pattern. The rollout lead wants to avoid site-level supplier substitutions before promotion review. What is the best first action?

A) Compare approved-source setup, supplier eligibility conditions, and procurement-relevant material preparation for the solvent across both sites
B) Limit the solvent to one site temporarily so source behavior appears stable during testing
C) Reduce approval involvement for regulated-material purchases so sourcing can move faster
D) Allow the affected site to continue using local supplier substitution until promotion is approved

4. A specialty foods company is validating stock transfer and inventory-control processing in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after moving one distribution center from a locally managed legacy process into the shared procurement template. Standard goods receipts and stock inquiries work for both the established and newly migrated locations. However, when warehouse users post a stock transfer for a subset of controlled materials, the system stops the posting with a status inconsistency for the new location only. The same users can complete similar transfer postings for unrestricted materials in the same plant, and the same controlled-material process works in the older location.
The migration lead wants the issue fixed before mock cutover. Manual stock adjustment is not allowed, and the solution must preserve the standard inventory process because the same rollout model will be reused for other locations.
What is the best first action?

A) Recreate the transfer documents because stock-movement status errors usually indicate transaction-entry inconsistency.
B) Check whether the migrated location has the required status and movement-control configuration aligned for the affected material subset.
C) Broaden warehouse posting authorizations so users can override the blocked transfer status in the new location.
D) Ask warehouse users to move the controlled materials through the older location until the new location stabilizes after go-live.

5. A catering-equipment supplier is validating conversion of approved purchase requisitions into standard purchase orders in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a newly introduced spare-accessories category. Requesters can create requisitions in SAP Fiori, and approval completes successfully for all test cases. For most categories, buyers convert the approved requisitions into purchase orders without difficulty. However, for the new accessories category, the approved requisitions remain selectable but fail during conversion because the item does not inherit the required downstream purchasing control state.
The same buyers can convert similar requisitions for another category in the same purchasing organization. The rollout lead wants the issue corrected before the next automated regression cycle. Buyers must not use workaround document types, and the solution must remain standard because later category activations will reuse the same design.
What should the consultant check first?

A) Rebuild requisition approval because approved demand should always move into the correct purchase-order processing state.
B) Ask buyers to use a temporary alternative purchasing document for the accessories category until rollout is complete.
C) Verify whether the affected accessories category is correctly linked to the downstream item-processing and purchasing-document determination settings.
D) Broaden buyer authorization so the blocked conversion can bypass the missing downstream control state.

質問と回答：