Anthropic CCAR-P 試験概要:

Anthropic CCAR-P 試験シラバストピック:

Anthropic Claude Certified Architect - Professional 認定 CCAR-P 試験問題：

問題 #1

You are preparing a HIPAA-eligible deployment for a healthcare customer.
Which configuration supports HIPAA compliance using Anthropic-offered tools?

A. Claude Free with no contractual addendum, since consumer products meet HIPAA requirements out of the box.
B. Claude Enterprise with a signed Business Associate Agreement, Zero Data Retention enabled, and audit logging configured for compliance tracking.
C. Disabling all audit logging so that no PHI is recorded in any log store, on the assumption that the absence of logs satisfies HIPAA requirements without a signed BAA.
D. An ad-hoc personal Claude account used by individual clinicians for PHI-related tasks, with no Business Associate Agreement, no Zero Data Retention, and no audit logging configured.

問題 #2

You are defining escalation criteria for ambiguous cases in an automated workflow.
Which set of criteria best supports consistent escalation?

A. A confidence score below a defined threshold, presence of high-impact decision categories, ambiguity flags raised by content classifiers, and the user's explicit request for review.
B. Escalation at the discretion of whoever is available when the team's on-call engineer has spare capacity, without a defined threshold, category, or ambiguity criterion.
C. Escalation only after an affected customer has contacted support to complain, after the automated workflow has already completed without human review.
D. No escalation criteria; the model decides independently on every turn whether to escalate, without explicit confidence thresholds, impact categories, or classifier-based ambiguity flags.

問題 #3

A healthcare organization is evaluating two Claude-powered AI architectures for a clinical documentation assistant. Architecture X produces higher output quality scores but costs $0.18 per documentation session and averages 4.2 seconds per response. Architecture Y scores slightly lower on quality metrics but costs $0.09 per session and averages 2.1 seconds per response. The stated SLA requires responses under 3 seconds, and the annual volume is projected at 2 million documentation sessions.
Which evaluation approach correctly applies business value pillar analysis to this decision?

A. Eliminate Architecture X on SLA grounds, then evaluate Architecture Y against the efficiency and solution cost pillars by calculating annual cost difference and assessing whether the quality delta materially impacts clinical workflow productivity.
B. Recommend a hybrid approach using Architecture X for complex cases and Architecture Y for routine cases, without additional analysis, since this preserves quality where it matters most.
C. Select Architecture X because the higher quality scores justify the cost premium, and any SLA gap can be addressed through infrastructure optimization after deployment.
D. Select Architecture Y based solely on the 50% cost reduction, since solution cost is the most important value pillar in healthcare budget-constrained environments.

問題 #4

You are producing an architecture guide for a new deployment and must complete the planning steps before drafting each section.
Which two steps must be completed BEFORE drafting each section of the guide? (Select two.) Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

A. Establish the document under version control with a defined review cadence and approver list.
B. Identify the audience and the questions the guide must answer for that audience.
C. Translate the guide into the supported regional languages for the candidate population.
D. Outline the guide sections covering the overview, components, contracts, flows, runbooks, and limitations.
E. Validate the guide with the implementation team and incorporate corrections.

問題 #5

You are choosing the level of detail for an implementation guide. The audience is a delivery team that will build the deployment.
Which guidance composition best serves them?

A. Component responsibilities and interface contracts only, without sequence diagrams of the dominant flows, configuration parameters with defaults, or runbooks to guide operational tasks.
B. An architecture overview and sequence diagrams for the dominant flows, without interface contracts, configuration-parameter tables, or operational runbooks for the delivery team to follow.
C. An architecture overview and a list of known limitations, without component-level diagrams, interface contracts, configuration parameters, or operational runbooks to support implementation.
D. Component responsibilities, contracts between components, sequence diagrams of the dominant flows, configuration parameters with defaults, and operational runbooks.

解説：